The LuLac Edition #373, Dec. 18th, 2007
PHOTO INDEX: NEW DEPUTY SHERIFF CARL ZAWATSKI AND NEWLY ELECTED SHERIFF MIKE SAVOKINAS SEEN AT A CAMPAIGN RALLY IN THE SUMMER.
SHOCKED!!!!
How can some people say they are shocked that newly minted Sheriff Mike Savokinas has appointed Carl Zawatski, a former top lawman himself to the post as his deputy? Zawatski and Savokinas were joined at the hip during the past campaign. But Zawatski's appointment was oversahowed by sniping between incoming Sheriff Savokinas and the outgoing incubent Barry Stankus. Savokinas, who takes office in January, on Monday accused Stankus of being unhelpful in aiding Savokinas in the transition into office. But Stankus insists his door has been open. Savokinas, he said, has lost a valuable opportunity to learn about how the office operates. Savokinas, a Democrat, defeated Stankus in the November general election. Savokinas complained about the lack of cooperation offered by Stankus during an interview Monday. Savokinas said he chose Zawatski, in part, because his experience as a former sheriff will be helpful in the transition into office.
OF LITTLE NOTE
Barely noticed amidst the hubbub of the county financial mess is this little item from the Times Leader. The Greater Wilkes-Barre Chamber of Business and Industry is asking the county to forgive about $1 million in interest owed on property in the Crestwood Industrial Park and the Hanover Crossings because that land has been deemed "unusable," county officials said. See, this is a huge problem. Local government gives tax breaks to organizations like the Chamber and out of town jaspers who promise "high paying jobs" for the consideration. Then when something goes wrong, they go hat in hand to "daddy government" and want all forgiven. Yet if a taxpayer tries to do that on a property, they'd laugh he or she out of the room. Wonder why we're in debt at the county level and still have pathetic paying jobs? Here's your answer.
6 Comments:
Dave,
I don't see how you can say that Savokinas is complaining. He is simply explaining his choice of Zawatski to the media. Stankus did not even have the courtesy to call Savokinas after he was defeated. As far as campaign signs, I believe it was a good strategy to get some free publicity. I guess it worked - he is the new Sheriff!!!!!!!!!!
The question is will he fire Katsock?
in regards to the sheriff can anyone say 1 term?
IN RESPONSE
The question is will he fire Katsock?
I'VE WONDERED THAT TOO. I'VE RUN INTO HER A FEW TIMES DURING THIS HOLIDAY SEASON AND THOUGHT IT WOULD BE RUDE TO BROACH THE SUBJECT. BUT HE REALLY SHOULD NOT. LOOK, HE WON BY A HAIR AND NEEDS BI PARTISAN SUPPORT, ESPECIALLY NOW WHEN PEOPLE ARE DOWN ON THE DEMOCRATS. TO GET RID OF A PROMINENT REPUBLICAN WHO HAS A PART TIME JOB WOULD BE SENSELESS IN MY OPINION.
Dave, Lets see when Stankus won in 1999 what did he do? Well, for starters he fired all the top officals under Zawatski and he fired one of them on Dec 24 (What a great Christmas Gift). When he hired his Chief did he interview anyone for that position. The answere is no. When he fired his Chief (Kammage) did he give anyone a reason? The answere is again NO. When he hired his current Chief and Deputy Chief did he interview and post for those positions? The answere is again NO. I feel Savokinas is getting a bad rap from the start by the NAY SAYERS in this wonderful county. The bottom line is that the papers only print what they want and not the facts.
well what is your opinion of the office now?
Post a Comment
<< Home