The LuLac Edition #3140, February 8th, 2016
There has been a great deal of consternation over Marco Rubio’s multiple responses to Chris Christie the other night in New Hampshire. Christie alluded to Rubio’s 25 second sound bite where he launches into his “Barack Obama knows exactly what he’s doing” in terms of changing the county. Here’s the quote:
"Let's dispel with his fiction that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is trying to change this country."
Of course the GOP pounced on the fact that Rubio kept on repeating the line back and whether it will hurt him or not in the long run is really up to the voters of New Hampshire. Rubio kept doubling down on his remarks and was even proud of making that point. And for me, rather than the fact that he had no other snappy comebacks for the Ralph Cramden of Joisey, is the realization that this statement is not even original or from his heart.
Listen to people like Michael Savage and Rush Limbaugh and this is what you hear. In the minds of the GOP Talk Radio establishment, Obama has changed the country. This fool talk about immigration, allowing gay people to get married, background checks for guns, yikes that is change. Change we don’t like if you read into the code that Rubio is giving us.
If Barack Obama really knew what he was doing, there would be more change that would set the national GOP’s hair on fire! Barack Obama changed the country because he was elected twice with majorities by the American people.
Rubio’s 25 second speech comes right out of talk radio. I’d quarrel with the originality of his thoughts rather than his so called passion.
Wolf has said he will ask for money for early childhood intervention, funding for Pre K students, a tax on the gas drillers, addressing the state’s budget’s structural deficit (which could reach over a billion by 2017) and a reorganization of some state agencies.
No word yet on how the GOP House and Senate will react but I’m sure they will follow their D.C. counterpart playbook. Wolf has made it clear that he will stand firm on issues he cares about. Hey maybe they can get a two for if they want to get people’s attention.
Look, no one, man or woman should for vote for Hillary Clinton because he’s a woman. They should vote for her because she is the most qualified person to run for President in the last forty years. The fact that women are supporting Bernie Sanders over Hillary mystifies me. The fact that younger women even consider Sanders makes me side with Steinem (who withdrew her where the boys are comment). Let me elaborate. I don’t think the young women are in it for “the boys” or the men are in it to meet women. It is a cause celeb and something to do. This millennial group has always done things in packs so it is not unusual that they follow Sanders who has great passion and ideas but has no lane to win a national campaign.
By the way, Hillary Clinton is closing in on Sanders in New Hampshire, you might see a very close face tomorrow night.
Good grief, now I'm hearing from people on how Monica Lewinsky was used and abused at the White House by Bill Clinton. Look, what he did with her was incredibly stupid and immature. But she was just fine with setting her cap on a President. Plus remember this only came to light because she trusted her "friend" Linda Tripp, (who she has since disavowed,) with the gossip. Let's not make Lewinsky into a referendum on this election and Hillary Clinton's fitness for office. Blaming Hillary Clinton for standing behind her errant husband is like blaming the whole thing on Newt Gingrich because he shut down the government and made the meeting of Bill and Monica possible.
In New Hampshire tomorrow night, Trump, Kasich, Bush (watch out for him!!!) and Rubio. Look for Cruz to take a dive.
10 Comments:
Monica was victimized after the fact and she was victimized primarily by Hilary Clinton.
It amazes me, that you so often, write about character and morality, yet the politicians you support are some the worst of the worst. The Kennedy's the Clinton's, they care nothing of destroying people to achieve their ends.
The means doesn't always justify the means.
What I find amazing is that someone as liberal as you, is not supporting Sanders.
Sanders, while I don't agree with his politics, is, for a politician, a stand up person, who has stood by his beliefs and ideals, and hasn't compromised them in the destruction of others.
So, when Tom Wolf, or any democrat, sticks to their ideals, no matter who gets hurt it is "standing firm."
When a republican does the same, they are obstructionist.
Dems and liberals are such fucking hypocrites.
I’d quarrel with the originality of his thoughts rather than his so called passion.
Wish I'd written that when Biden was caught plagiarizing.
BREAKING NEWS: Yonki exposes Hillary's support for transgenders!!!
"Look, no one, man or woman should for vote for Hillary Clinton because he’s a woman."
Dave,
I am very confused as how you are such a supporter of Clinton over Sanders.
I understand if there is no genuine progressive or liberal choice to take the least of all choice, but there is a genuine liberal, a progressive, and dare I use the word, socialist, Bernie Sanders espouses much of the same left leaning ideas that have sprung from your keyboard over the years.
Clinton, is more like Bush than FDR.
Her deal with USB bank has much in common with kids for cash.
I know you are having a Hilary love-fest, even to the point of supporting the victimization of the women who Bill Clinton sexually assaulted, or tried to bully into submission.
I just don't get it, Sanders is much more in line with your thinking than Clinton.
So, is your ideology so flimsy that you will not support someone who may actually do good, or are you simply about voting for a democrat who is female?
The Clintons are all that is wrong with American politics, to the point they may have been in on some issues in Iowa.
They are the same as the Bushes, and they're political ideology isn't that far from theirs.
I suggest you read the following, all from liberal sources.
http://www.salon.com/2016/02/09/hillary_clintons_political_machine_has_been_busted_thanks_to_bernie_sanders_and_elizabeth_warren/
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/08/21/the-first-postmodern-political-machine/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qMA4ZSB_P4
According to LA Tarone, Governor Wolf said something to the effect that is was okay if people lost their home to increased taxes, as long as education was funded. Is that accurate? If so, **** him! It is obvious he is not really a man of the people. The guy may drive a jeep, but as a friend of mine in York said, you should see the other cars in his garage.
What I find amazing is that someone as liberal as you, is not supporting Sanders.
IN RESPONSE
I supported McGovern in '72 after Humphrey lost. I supported Mondale in 1984 after voting for Reagan in '80.
With Sanders, unlike McGovern and Mondale who lost 49 states, Sanders will lose all 50. Even Vermont.
As a Democrat Liberal Reactionary, (I am for the death penalty) I want the tepid agenda enacted by Mr. Obama to live on. Clinton if she had won in '08 would have done more.
You have to win, then govern smart.
While I admire Bernie, he is incapable of doing either.
I’d quarrel with the originality of his thoughts rather than his so called passion.
Wish I'd written that when Biden was caught plagiarizing.
IN RESPONSE
I almost wrote what you wrote last night but the 16 year old and a half year old puppy was looking for his supper.
So, is your ideology so flimsy that you will not support someone who may actually do good, or are you simply about voting for a democrat who is female?
IN RESPONSE
My ideology is this, protect people, give them a leg up if they need help, punish them severely if they kill, and accomplish something.
Doing good is fine but one must first be elected to do good.
Hubert Humphrey would have stopped the war in Vietnam but he lost.
George McGovern changed the political landscape, but he lost.
Al Gore would have transformed America but he lost.
You have to win to govern. Bernie can't and even if he won, how the hell would he work with Congress?
One of my favorite movies is "No Time For Sergeants" with Andy Griffith. Wil Stockdale the private one day is told that a woman in the Air Corps is an officer. That's all he should see. Just her rank.
In Hillary Clinton, I see without gender the most qualified person to lead this country. Bernie and Martin O'Malley are not.
When Sarah Palin ran with McCain, I did not see a woman. I saw an incompetent person who I wouldn't trust to run a banana stand.
Like Private Stockdale, I see the qualifications not the sex.
So I guess my ideology is winning and then trying to achieve the question the late Governor Bob Casey asked, "What did you do when you had the power?'
But you have to get the power first!
According to LA Tarone,
tell L.A. there's gotta be a very tall woman in this Wolf equation with The Yonk.
Post a Comment
<< Home