Wednesday, May 13, 2009

The LuLac Edition #816, May 13th, 2009

PHOTO INDEX: 13 QUESTIONS LOGO.

13 QUESTIONS


1. WHO DO YOU SEE WINNING THE JUDICIAL RACE ON TUESDAY IN BOTH COUNTIES?

IN LACKAWANNA I THINK MARGIE MOYLE HAS THE EDGE BECAUSE SHE HAS A CORE GENDER VOTE THAT SHE CAN ADD ON TO. I DON’T SEE THE OTHERS HAVING THAT BUILT IN ADVANTAGE. LUZERNE COUNTY? WHO KNOWS. THE PEOPLE WHO SPENT THE MOST MONEY DON’T SEEM TO BE GETTING TRACTION. AND THE ONES WHO DIDN’T SEEM TO HAVE A BUZZ ON THEIR CANDIDACY.

2.THESE FORUMS YOU HOLD SEEM TO NOT GET PUBLIC INTEREST. WHY BOTHER?

LOOK, IF I CAN INFORM AND EDUCATE ONE MORE PERSON THAT WASN’T THAT WAY BEFORE, THEN THE AGGRAVATION IS WORTH IT. WELL ALL HAVE CIVIC RESPONSIBILITIES AND THIS IS HOW I PERFORM MINE.

3. WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ABOUT CORBETT’S VENDETTA AGAINST THE FRIENDLY SONS?

I DON’T THINK IT’S A VENDETTA. THE MAN IS EXPRESSING A DEEP SEATED, PERSONAL OPINION THAT MANY GOOD OLD BOYS, IRISH OR NOT WILL NOT CARE FOR. WOMAN SHOULD BE ABLE TO BUY A TICKET AND CIRCULATE IF THEY ARE WILLING TO PAY THEIR MONEY. THE WESTMORELAND CLUB DIDN’T FALL APART WHEN ATTORNEY ENID HARRIS JOINED IT SO LET THE WOMEN IN. BESIDES, ALWAYS REMEMBER ST. PATRICK WAS BORN IN ITALY.

4. WHY DO YOU MODERATE YOUR COMMENTS?

I DO SO BECAUSE I WANT TO BE FAIR, DON’T THINK MEAN SPIRITED ATTACKS HAVE A PLACE HERE AND THINK THEY SERVE NO PURPOSE. THIS AFTERNOON I DID NOT PUT A COMMENT ON THAT TALKED ABOUT A CANDIDATE’S WEIGHT. IT HAS NO BEARING ON HOW THEY WILL SERVE. I ALSO DON’T POST THINGS DEMEANING TO ANY RACE, GENDER OR NATION. IT DOESN’T ADD TO THE DISCOURSE.

5. CONTROLLER’S RACE. FAVORITES?

I LIKE THEM ALL. AS A DEMOCRAT SINCE BOB MORGAN IS UNOPPOSED I’M GOING TO MAYBE WRITE IN A GOP NAME.

6. WITH THE SCRANTON STATE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF BEING SCREWED BY YOUR BOY ED RENDELL, HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT HIM NOW?

STILL THINK HE IS A GREAT POLITICAL PERSONALITY I LIKE VERY MUCH FOR HIS CHARISMA AND ABILITIES. I DO THINK THOUGH HE HAS COME UP SHORT IN TERMS OF THE SCRANTON SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF, LIBRARY FUNDING AND NOT THINKING ABOUT HIS LONG TERM LEGACY. I MEAN DOES HE REALLY WANT IT TO BE GAMBLING? RENDELL CAN GO OUT BLAZING IF HE TRIED TO REFORM OUR BLIGHTED LEGISLATURE.

7. YOU HATE THE BISHOP RIGHT?

NOPE. TRY NOT TO HATE ANYONE. I THINK HE IS TRYING TO DO WHAT HE THINKS HIS BEST. BUT HIS INTERESTS SEEM TO CONFLICT WITH THOSE OF HIS FLOCK TO PARAPHRASE VITO CORRLEONE HERE. THE BISHOP HAS HAD A TONE DEAF EAR TO MANY ISSUES CATHOLICS CARE ABOUT. AND INSTEAD OF HEALING WOUNDS REGARDING SCHOOL AND CHURCH CLOSURES, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE HE MAKES IT A PRIORITY TO PULL OFF THE SCAB ON THE PROBLEM INSTEAD OF APPLYING SOME BALM.

8. IN THE SUMMER, SOCKS OR NO SOCKS?

NONE IF I CAN HELP IT. BUT WHEN YOU WEAR A SUIT YOU NEED THEM OR YOU’LL LOOK LIKE A DOOFUS.

9. FAVORITE ALCOHOLIC DRINK?

NOT MUCH OF A DRINKER BUT I LIKE BAILEYS, REISLING WINE, RED STRIPE AND COORS LIGHT IN THAT ORDER.

10. THE RACE FOR PROTHONOTARY? YOUR CHOICE?

WALTER MITCHELL ALL THE WAY. GOING TO WRITE HIS NAME IN FOR THE MAY 19th ELECTION. AND HOPE HE GETS OUT OF THE GOP PRIMARY.

11. YOU’RE DOING 1964 AS A FEATURE. WHY?

A LOT HAPPENED, CIVIL RIGHTS, THE BEATLES, THE AFTERMATH OF THE JFK KILLING, AND THE ’64 PHILLIES.

12. DO YOU EVER MODERATE PERSONAL ATTACKS YOU GET ON YOURSELF?

NOT REALLY. I’M ON THE FIRING LINE EVERYDAY AND IF SOMEONE WANTS TO CALL ME A FAT, DISEASE RIDDEN, SOCIALIST BIGOT WHO HARBORS COMMUNIST LESBIANS IN MY ATTIC, THEN FINE. BUT JUST DON’T TRY IT WITH SOMEONE ELSE WHO DOESN’T HAVE THIS FORUM TO DEFEND THEMSELVES.

13. ARE YOU A REGULAR COMMUNICANT IN YOUR CHURCH?

NOPE.

29 Comments:

At 4:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One question I'm sure you'd be asked, what did you think of the Zola flyer that showed the lady with a knife to her neck?

 
At 5:11 PM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
what did you think of the Zola flyer that showed the lady with a knife to her neck?
I GOT THAT IN THE MAIL LAST THURSDAY AND MADE A DECISION NOT TO PUT IT ON MY SITE. HERE'S WHY, 1. THE AD WAS INFLAMATORY AND DID NOT ADDRESS THE FACTS. 2. THE AD WAS MOST LIKELY AGAINST JUDICIAL CANONS. 3. ZOLA DID NOT ATTEND THE LULAC OR LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS FORUM TO FACE THE PEOPLE LIKE THE OTHER CANDIDATES DID. HIS EXCUSE FOR THE LEAGUE FORUM WAS THAT HE HAD BUSINESS WITH THE D.A.'S OFFICE, MAYBE, BUT BILL AMESBURY HAD AN ARRAIGNMENT BUT STILL MANAGED TO COME BACK TO THE MEETING. ZOLA IS A YOUNG MAN AND MAYBE HAS TO LEARN YOU CAN'T BUY AN ELECTION WITH A LOT OF MONEY AND SCARE TACTICS. YOU HAVE TO LOOK VOTERS IN THE EYE AND ASK THEM FOR THEIR VOTE.

 
At 5:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Always enjoy 13 Questions.

Corbett has got this guy Tierney
in his sights and he makes a good case! I think Lackawanna County can
do without this guy. Judges need to be held to a higher standard or you wind up with a Judiciary like Luzerne County. I hope voters in the Lu and the Lac learn from the recent past and continue to pay close attention in the months and years to come and I appreciate your efforts. Business as usual cannot be allowed to continue in NEPA!

 
At 5:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sir, Your remarks regarding the Zola flyer are eloquent. Look me in the eye and ask for my vote and in :30 sec or less tell me why I should vote for you.

 
At 7:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

SORRY BUCKO ...
According to the Catholic Church, he was born in Scotland, around the area now known as Kilpatrick ("cell of Patrick") and his parents (Calpurnius and Conchessa) were Romans living in Britain to watch over colonies. Around the age of 14 he was captured as part of a raid and brought to Ireland until he escaped at age 20 back to Britain and his family. After having a prophetic dream he was ordained and eventually became a bishop, upon which time he set out to take the Gospel to Ireland, which at the time was a land of Druids and pagans. He succeeded in converting chietans and entire kingdoms, acquiring a large following of disciples. For 40 years he roamed Ireland converting people wherever he went and built Ireland's first church at Saul, where he later died.

 
At 8:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're just a little full of yourself, aren't you.

 
At 10:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

On the weight issue, my comment was not about the fact that he was overweight, it was the lack of discipline that allowed his weight to get out of control. The fact that he is undisciplined in one regard of life demonstrates exactly how he may serve, in an undisciplined manner. When one enters politics all is on the table and we should be allowed to comment on it in an open forum. I really think that if you are not going to allow the free flow of ideas then you should not allow comments at all.

 
At 10:46 PM, Anonymous The Much Maligned Anonymous Poster said...

I agree that Zola should show up, but also his flyer is relevent. There have been what 9 or 10 murders in Luzerne county this year. Judges may not be on the street, but their sentences can send a message. Also, it got plenty of attention and much free media... It may not make a difference, but in a race of 17 it set him apart from the crowd. Now we will have to see if that makes a difference. I am not voting for him, but not because of his flier. I am voting only for women, and only attractive women. Go Tina and Jenn...

 
At 11:07 PM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
According to the Catholic Church, he was born in Scotland, around the area now known as Kilpatrick ("cell of Patrick") and his parents (Calpurnius and Conchessa) were Romans living in Britain to watch over colonies.
SORRY, I STAND CORRECTED.
it was the lack of discipline that allowed his weight to get out of control. The fact that he is undisciplined in one regard of life demonstrates exactly how he may serve, in an undisciplined manner.
THAT IS ABSURD. PEOPLE WITH A LITTLE EXTRA WEIGHT AREN'T UNDISCIPLINED. AS ONE WHO HAS STRUGGLED WITH WEIGHT ALL MY LIFE, I THINK YOUR COMMENTS ARE PREJUDICIAL BORDERING ON JUST PLAIN BIGOTED. ME? I DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT WHETHER ANYONE THINKS I'M UNDISCIPLEND BECAUSE I'VE BEEN FAT ALL MY LIFE. BUT WHEN YOU SAY A JUDGE WON'T DO HIS JOB BECAUSE OF A FEW EXTRA POUNDS SAY A LOT ABOUT YOUR JUDGEMENT OF YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS. LET ME SHARE FOR YOU A CAUTIONARY TALE: I HAD THIS GIRLFRIEND WHO LOOKED DOWN HER NOSE ON PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T HAVE PERFECT BODIES. SHE WAS CONCEITED AND MEAN. BUT HOT WHICH WAS PART OF MY ADDICTION PROBLEM. BUT GUESS WHAT? WHEN SHE HIT 55, SHE EXPLODED HORIZONTALLY. I DON"T WISH THAT ON YOU, BUT I HOPE YOU LOSE SOME WEIGHT IN YOUR FAT, PREJUDICED HEAD!
You're just a little full of yourself, aren't you.
ALWAYS!!!!!

 
At 11:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

He is not a little over weight. He is morbidly obese. And your sensitivity aside, it is not about appearance, it is about disciple in life. Lack of discipline in one aspect can and often does lead to lack of it in other parts. You made my point, you were a womanizer, your lack of discipline in regards to your weight showed a lack of discipline in another, fidelity, commitment and monogamy. I am sorry if I offended you, however I strongly believe it to be relevant. This is an individual asking me and others for our vote and in turn our trust. If he can not take responsibility for his own health, what other responsibilities will he neglect? You may disagree, you may think I am prejudice, but it is a valid point to me. It isn't about weight, it isn't about appearance, it isn't even about health... It is about a lack of self control, something I feel is very important in a judge. Lack of self control is what caused the recent problems.
And a quick aside, I do not have a perfect body. I am about 50 pounds overweight. The lack of self control is something I am well aware and I am well aware of other areas I lack control over and all are negative and all would have a negative impact if I were to be a judge.

 
At 11:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

p.s. his running for judge ad is the best ad out there.....

 
At 2:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey 10:06, ever hear of Winston
Churchill, a portly chap. He saved a Country with leadership and discipline. I guess according to your theory people who get cancer dont deserve your vote either because if they'd of taken care of themselves it wouldnt have happened! Geez, man, its 2009!

 
At 8:07 AM, Anonymous The Much Maligned Anonymous Poster said...

non 2:08. Winston's lack of control brought about the current mid east structure that led to the rise of Islamic terrorism. His divide and conquer, contstant splitting of tribes and countries with lack of control or foresight, much the way an obese individual attacks a buffet table, had long term ramifications that more than likely caused more death and destruction than he was responsible for saving. And Churchill was a drunk on top of being overweight.
And he did not save England. The United States entry into WWII changed the tide. If Hitler did not go into the USSR and the Japanese did not attack Pearl Harbor, Great Britian surely would have fallen. Before Churchill the sun never set on the British Empire, after Churchill the Empire collapsed and GB as a world power declined rapidly.
However, with all that said, I do not agree with the other poser however, I know Terranna and he is getting one of my two votes.

 
At 8:14 AM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
Lack of discipline in one aspect can and often does lead to lack of it in other parts. You made my point, you were a womanizer, your lack of discipline in regards to your weight showed a lack of discipline in another, fidelity, commitment and monogamy. I am sorry if I offended you,
YOUR KEY WORD THERE IS "OFTEN". THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF. IN MY CASE, THE WEIGHT WAS ALWAYS THERE, THE WOMANIZING CAME LATER AND ONE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OTHER. IF I WERE IN PUBLIC OFFICE, THE TWO WOULD HAVE NO EFFECT ON MY ABILITY TO SERVE THE PUBLIC WELL. FDR HAD AFFAIRS, CHURCHILL DRANK FROM NOON ON AND WAS PORTLY. THEY SAVED THE FREAKING WORLD FROM HITLER. WOULD YOU HAVE PREFERRED NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN AND ALF LANDON, TWO STICK THIN INDIVIDUALS AT THE HELM? C'MON, WE ARE IN AN AGE OF MULTI TASKING AND I CAN ASSURE YOU I HAVE PERFORMED WELL IN JOBS JUGGLING DOUBLE CHEESEBURGERS AND REDHEADS. I COULD MOST LIKELY DO IT NOW BUT IT IS EXHAUSTING AND NOT VERY FAIR TO THE PEOPLE COMMITED TO ME. YOU DID NOT OFFEND ME BUT YOU OFFENDED MY SENSIBILITY THAT YOU ARE JUDGING SOMEONE ON APPEARANCE DESPITE YOUR DENIALS TO THE CONTRARY.
And a quick aside, I do not have a perfect body. I am about 50 pounds overweight. The lack of self control is something I am well aware and I am well aware of other areas I lack control over and all are negative and all would have a negative impact if I were to be a judge.
SEE THIS IS WHERE I THINK YOU'RE WRONG. I BELIEVE THAT THE SHORTCOMING WE SEE IN OURSELVES GIVES US THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE MORE EMPHATHETIC TO PEOPLE WE JUDGE. THERE IS NO BLACK AND WHITE BECAUSE OUR WEAKNESSES GIVE US A GRAY AREA. YOUR 50 POUNDS I BELIEVE SHOULD GIVE YOU A BETTER WAY TO VIEW THOSE WHO FALTER AND ARE NOT PERFECT. AS FOR ME, MY CANCER KNOCKED OFF CONSIDERABLE WEIGHT WHICH I AM GRATEFUL FOR IN A STRANGE SORT OF WAY. BUT NEITHER, THE CANCER OR WEIGHT, PLUS OR MINUS HAD AN EFFECT ON THE WAY I DID BUSINESS. BECAUSE MY FOCUS WAS ON MY JOB AND THAT'S WHERE THE DISCIPLINE, AT LEAST FOR ME, CAME IN.

 
At 8:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I, too, enjoy Baileys, on vacation, in my coffee.

 
At 8:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

we will have to agree to disagree. i could give other examples of great leaders who's lack of control, bill clinton, kept him from genuine greatness, and you can give me other examples, again clinton, who many thought he acheived greatness. it is my opinion and my view, i respect your opinions and while i disgree i would not have the closed mindedness to hurl names and acqusations of bigotry. i always kind of find it funny that those with a liberal slant are usually the most closed minded when it comes to otheres opinions. even when i gave you my rational and insight you intimated i was lying. you can not accept my view because YOU feel it is wrong.
as far as scintific prroof. human nature can neither be proved or disproved... it is what it is...

 
At 8:38 AM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
it is my opinion and my view, i respect your opinions and while i disgree i would not have the closed mindedness to hurl names and acqusations of bigotry. i always kind of find it funny that those with a liberal slant are usually the most closed minded when it comes to otheres opinions. even when i gave you my rational and insight you intimated i was lying.
ME? A LIBERAL? WELL MAYBE. LOOK, I RESPECT YOUR OPINION ALTHOUGH IN THIS CASE I REALLY DISAGREE WITH IT. IF I IN ANY WAY GAVE YOU THE IMPRESSION THAT I THOUGHT YOU WERE LYING, I APOLOGIZE. THE BIGOTRY COMMENT, IN THE HEAT OF THE MOMENT. WE'LL DISAGREE ON THIS BUT I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS AND YOUR READING. IN TERMS OF CLOSE MINDEDNESS, I HAVE ANOTHER TAKE ON THAT. I THINK ONCE YOU ENGAGE IN A DEBATE YOU TEND TO HUNKER DOWN, LIBERAL OR NOT.

 
At 8:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Baileys!!!
That's fattening isn't it?

 
At 8:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

enjoying the debate between you and my girl friend. one question though, if appearance is not important why when ever you were on t.v. you always were smartly dressed. very sharp suits and great ties? i think appearnce is somewhat important, if not you t.v. time would have had you in sweats or jeans or something less than what appeared to be pretty pricey suits...

 
At 8:43 AM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
Baileys!!!
That's fattening isn't it?
TROUBLEMAKER!

 
At 8:58 AM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
if appearance is not important why when ever you were on t.v. you always were smartly dressed. very sharp suits and great ties? i think appearnce is somewhat important, if not you t.v. time would have had you in sweats or jeans or something less than what appeared to be pretty pricey suits...
I ALWAYS SAW CLOTHING AS A SIGN OF RESPECT TOWARD YOURSELF AND OTHERS. TO SHOW UP ON TV WITH SWEEATS WOULD BE DISRESPECTING THE INSTITUTION. SAME THING WITH GOING TO CHURCH, I'D NEVER WEAR SWEATS TO CHURCH. AS FOR THE TIES AND SUITS, THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT. PRICEY SUITS? DON'T KNOW, I HAVE BOUGHT CLASSICS ALL OF MY LIFE SO MOST OF THE SUITS I OWN I BOUGHT IN RACUSINS YEARS AGO. I'M FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO HAVE THEM FIT. AS FOR YOUR GIRLFRIEND, YOU ARE A VERY LUCKY GUY. HER INTELLIGENCE AND PASSION FOR HER BELIEFS MUST MAKE YOUR RELATIONSHIP INTERESTING. THE WORST THING TO ME, AND I'M MAKING A JUDGEMENT HERE IS TO GO INTO A RESTAURANT AND SEE A COUPLE, YOUNG OR OLD, DINING AND NOT SAYING A WORD TO EACH OTHER. I DON'T THINK THAT HAPPENS IN YOUR CASE.

 
At 9:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for the lesson on Churchill.
I didnt realize he was such a screw up and responsible for all thats wriong in the world. Give me a guy who was either in good shape or wore a corset like Geo W anyday!
Some folks have all the answers and spin everything their way. We can all see where that has gotten us! Youre right, fool, its 1914 and too many fat people sank the Titanic.

 
At 12:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Without Churchill there would have been no British Empire for the sun to set on. The world changed and there was no place for empires.
Your history lesson is flawed.

Prof Erwin Corey

 
At 5:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

yo prof did not have the time and space to go into detail... was just trying to make a quick point about what glutony in one aspect of life can bleed into another. again, it isn't the end all and be all, i just don't care for undisciplined people in leadership roles and obesity is a sign of lack of discipline. i know i am 50 pounds overweight and i lack discipline in many aspects of my life. as far as the titanic, there weren't as many fat people in 1914 as there are today.
the lack of discipline is my opinion. mr. yonki made a point about clothing being a sign of respect to yourself and to others. then why is not body habitus a similar show of respect. if you respect yourself so little to take a care to keep your appearance up, what kind of respect do you have for others?
to be so overweight that you move into obesity as the candidate i was discusing, imho, shows such a lack of discipline and i am extrapolating from mr. yonki's statement a lack of respect that he will not get my vote.

 
At 7:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think you're all nuts. I looked at his picture, I've seen him in person, he is not morbidly obese. And even if he was the size of Jabba the hut, if he was and is an honest man like I know he is, I'm going to use my discipline to vote for JOE TERRANA and tell as many people I know to do so.

 
At 10:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey genius, Prof Irwin Corey was a
comedian from the 60s. Youve been had and its not the first time I bet.

 
At 6:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't give a f*** (edited) who he was, I was just responding by the name he signed nimrod... I bet it has been years since you have had any sex you ****less wonder(edited).... so f*** (edited) you!

 
At 12:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I didnt post the comment, I was just letting you know who he was
and that youd been had! Your class and style speaks for itself and what does sex have to do with it?
Perhaps counseling is in order in a couple of areas for you as you are clearly troubled!

Slim

 
At 4:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sadly the intellectual level of you posters is being dragged down by at least one idiot with his/her frighteningly sad revelations about themself in the guise of critizing others. I agree 100% with Slim.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home