Tuesday, October 23, 2018

The LuLac Edition #3910, October 23rd, 2018

PASHINSKI/HENRY FORUM 

Representative Eddie Day Pashinski and challenger Sue Henry squared off in a debate Tuesday night at the Jewish Community Center in Wilkes Barre. The debate was civil and gave the audience contrasting views of the two.
Pashinski was polished, methodical and constricted by a time limit. But he tried to explain his views on Property Tax Reform while Henry explained her view on Senate Bill 76.
Pashinski wondered why the GOP with full control of the three branches of government didn’t bring it up. Henry said the time for action was now. She said it was ready to pass, but a Democrat, Senator John Blake, (he of The Lac who is running against Tax Reform advocate Frank Scavo) killed it voting no in committee. By himself! Then Lt Governor Mike Stack ended it by voting no.
On unions, Pashimski hearkened back to the time when collective bargaining helped middle class families. But those union jobs are dwindling and only a few in the audience seemed to be union members. Henry said that middle class families are squeezed by taxes.
On whether to ban teacher’s strikes, Henry said yes. Pashinski again referred back to collective bargaining.
On the new school in Wilkes Barre, Pashinski pointed to the diminished state funds to help school districts. Henry felt that the costs outweighed the benefits and the burden would be on property owners. Henry said taxes would rise tremendously with the new building.
There was one outburst from the audience, the WB Area Superintend of Schools who said something about touring something or the other. He was shouted down.
On the reducing the size of the Legislature, Henry gave a one word answer, “YES!” while Pashinski said State reps need to be closer to the people pointing out that State Senators cover more ground. A reduction in the size he said would cost more money.
The tense part of the forum came when Henry said she would not take the $191.00 a day per dim Pashinski gets. She said she’d get the most economical form of transportation and said she’d have her own retirement plan.
Pashinski called her statement “a shot” and told the assembled crowd (about 125) that he would continue to work hard in the district. He defended his staff and office budget of $335,000 a year.
Reading the crowd, I saw a lot of heads nodding at Henry’s pronouncements. The Pashinski people called Henry rude in her presentation (I honestly didn’t see that!) but the older ladies were “tut tutting” about her. In terms of applause, Pashinski had more support and cheers at the end. So he won the crowd vote but one has to wonder what others who did not clap at the end were thinking.
Those will be the voters who decide this race.

SEE FORUM ON TV TOMORROW
If you missed it, our good friend Scott Cannon taped it. It will be on Service Electric Channel 2 tomorrow night. Thanks to the League of Women Voters who did a fine if not prodding job in presenting the candidates.

HERE’S A GOOD ONE

MEDIA ADVISORY: PA GOP Chairman Val DiGiorgio to call out Democrats and liberal dark money groups like PA Fund for Change for deceitful ads and mailers being sent across Pennsylvania

This guy is a piece of work. The Democrats can’t even organize a bus ride and they have a deep state? This guy, every time he opens his mouth makes an ass out of himself.

8 Comments:

At 11:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That Super is Eddie's son in law!!!!!! His kids go to school in Crestwood!

 
At 11:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pashinski's staff houses one of Todd Eachus' lackeys, Dave Plermo, an out of district hire from Hazleton. Eachus is trying to get on the marijuana bandwagon by lobbying for it in the state.

 
At 6:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was there last nighht. I thought your thoughts on contrast was right on. Pashinski was more lke a college professor explaining the complexities of the job while Sue was still doing her radio show. Both were good but Representative Pashinski was better. But does "better" mean anything these days?

 
At 9:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As much as I want to vote for Sue, I can't do it. She appears to have colluded with the local republican committee, much the same way Hilary did with the DNC. She didn't earn her way on to the November ballot and no matter how anyone tries to spin it, that plain and simply stinks.

 
At 11:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Only time HB 76 came up for a vote it failed 138-59. With 28 people that COSPONSORED IT voting AGAINST IT!!!

WHEN YOU SUPPORT A BILL AND SUPPIRT IT YOU USUALLY VOTE FOR IT.

 
At 1:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'll be very surprised if Ms. Henry pulls off a win in this election. I don't think that she is out and about and in people's faces enough. I've seen some signs around the area, and I've read about her campaign in your column, but not much. To beat an incumbent, you really have to up your game. Maybe her heart just isn't in it enough or she is just naieve about the whole thing going her way.

 
At 2:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So apparently Henry never said how she'd end her party's unconstitutional gerrymandering or whether she approves of the chronic lying of The Orange One.

We notice, believe me.

 
At 10:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:19 .. all you had to do was listen to her radio show to know she is a hhhuuuuggggeeee Trump supporter.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home