Tuesday, May 10, 2016

The LuLac Edition #3207, May 10th, 2016






So Donald Trump described Hillary Clinton as an “enabler,” he added, “some of these women were destroyed, not by him, but by the way that Hillary Clinton treated them after everything went down.”
Okay here are my questions. Who was destroyed? Was Monica Lewinsky destroyed when she gave a lecture on bullying and started a line of designer fashion accessories? Did Hillary go and assault any of them? Did Hillary invade their homes and tie them up? Did she take away their children? How in the world were they “destroyed?” And how much power does Hillary Clinton have to destroy them?
Once again Donald Trump has no specifics and just spouts lies. 
Look Hillary had a right to be pissed at the women as well as her husband. But to hear Trump tell it Hillary was pimping for Bill.
Was Bill a hound and chased what he perceived to be classy chassis? Sure but remember those chassis he was chasing came to a stop and let him in the driver’s seat.


At 10:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You apparently have forgotten that destruction can manifest itself in many forms and degrees since acknowledging it would invalidate the lame logic you use to defend Hillary.
If you have as much experience in media and politics as you claim you know how easy it would be to destroy someone you dislike. You have stated many times that you would not support a post or poster knowing it would have that effect. That's good.
You need to take the advice you offer the Trump supporters. You're making Hillary appear defective.

At 12:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow. You are either the biggest sexist on the planet or have cheated a lot.
So you're saying Paula Jones asked to have Clinton's cock whipped out at her, or Katherine Willy was invited Bill Clinton to pin her up against a wall and feel her up.
As far as the affairs, the victimization came after they were brought to public attention.
The Clinton Camp, with the face of the camp Hilary, claimed it was all a vast right wing conspiracy. None of it was true. The women were branded as liars, and put through a public shaming.
If you can't see it, then it is hard to have a discussion.

At 8:50 PM, Blogger David Yonki said...

As far as the affairs, the victimization came after they were brought to public attention.


By Linda Tripp and enemies of the Clinton. The "accusers" all went on TV.

At 6:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"By Linda Tripp and enemies of the Clinton. The "accusers" all went on TV. "

Did Tripp call attack Jones, Wiley, Flowers, etc??
Your logic is so far off on this one. Hilary led the campaign to brand them as liars, to destroy their credibility, to assault them.
As far as Lewinski; Bill Clinton at the very least committed sexual harassment. In basic terms, in his position as supervisor, he would have been fired.
Regardless, the attack mode after the revelation was led by Hilary.
In today's day and age, women of position and power don't tolerate being humiliated in public let alone go on the defensive. The more Trump brings this up and awakens women that Hilary is not on their side, but on the side of repression, she will lose many of them.
Only people of your generation who , or those have actually humiliated their wives, believe that cheating and humiliating and disrespecting a wife and expecting her to stand by their man will be standing with her in the end.
I guess Hilary is a Tammy Wynett stand by her man type after all..

At 5:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

From the Kennedys to the Clintons, Yonk will defend any dem that disrespects women. Kind of sad.


Post a Comment

<< Home