Monday, December 17, 2007

The LuLac Edition #371, Dec. 17th, 2007








PHOTO INDEX: FORMER PITTSBURGH MAYOR PETE FLAHERTY AND GOVERNOR ED RENDELL.


FIGHT OR FLIGHT


The recent debit card and financial crisis got me thinking the other day about the type of politicians we elect. There are some people who aspire to public office because they want fame and a bit of notoriety. I had an uncle who was a school director for over twenty years and I'm convinced he did it because he wanted to help people but he wanted them to know he helped them. He was a behind the scenes guy, not bombastic. Then there are some that crave power, they want to leave a legacy, a building, some type of monument. Others want to help their friends. There are all types of reasons but with politicians, in my mind, there are only two types. The guys who fight and the ones who take flight. The fighters get in there just for the fight. The flighters use that as a tool to escape the hard questions. The fighters relish the high hard ones, the flighters, well they run away from them. My best friend once had former Pittsburgh Mayor Pete Flaherty in a class at Carnegie Mellon University. The class was being conducted right at the time of Three Mile Island. (Flaherty had lost the 1978 Governor's race to Richard Thornburgh only months before.) One of Flaherty's students asked Flaherty if he was relieved not to be Governor at a critical time of crisis. The former candidate arched an eyebrow and said, "Are you kidding me? I would've eaten that exposure up." Another politician who not only steps into the fray but creates some of it himself is Governor Ed Rendell. He welcomes the chance to meet the media and go head to head, even when the battle is not in his favor. These politicians are your examples of leaders who get into the fight, stand their ground and even if you disagree with them, come out looking better than they did before. Currently there are people calling for the resignation of Commissioner Greg Skrepenak. Skep has not done anything illegal to warrant that but the perception is among the public is that he does not want to face this issue head on. The Commissioner has been interviewed on TV (tonight on WBRE) and has made some comments. But many agree it might have been better if the ex lineman steppeed into a crowded room of reporters, rolled up his sleeves, gave his spokesperson the afternoon off and say, "let me have it, ask me what you want". He is a savvy guy who knows the inner workings of the various departments. His knowledge is impressive but no one sees that because his very political persona is being kidnapped by the misconception that he is not leading in this crisis. Skrepenak should fight, not take flight. If he fights and answers everything, this debit card fiasco will subside sooner than later. See, the late Flaherty and Rendell loved the idea of getting beat up and sparring with their enemies. And you can't blame Skrepenak if he finds that distasteful, but the best way to calm this down is to speak now in the open and let it fly.


THE GRIER ATTACK


So the county bond lawyer Peter Moses says that Wilkes Barre resident has no standing because he doesn't own property in the county. Maybe Grier could borrow a small parcel from the people who took over the land to build a cargo airport in Hazleton. Grier, as a resident uses county services. That counts. Is the good barrister saying that we are returning to the good old days when only the landed gentry can question the dealings of government? Sounds like it to me.


LEGAL BEAGLES??


Critics of County Judge Anne Lokuta may ultimately get her head on a silver platter like they intended but one has to wonder about the ultimate cost. Recent testimony in the case brings to light some pretty gamey machinations among the Luzerne County Judiciary. It is what many have suspected all along but this is the first time there has been an actual unveiling of these antics. From the Times Leader:
Startling information came to light Thursday during the Judge Ann Lokuta misconduct trial. And it wasn't just more details about bickering between the judge and her staff. Lokuta said that fellow Luzerne County judges attempted to sway one of her rulings and interfered with several cases. During Thursday's testimony, Lokuta said that then-President Judge Patrick Toole tried toinfluence one of her rulings in a tax assessment case, reported staff writer David Weiss. Lokuta also testified that she was assigned to handle a civil case and scheduled it for trial in late 2002. But an attorney in the case wanted the case to be postponed. The attorney went to President Judge MichaelConahan, who granted the postponement, she said. In another example, Lokuta said that when she was handling a murder appeal, the attorney who was representing the defendant wanted to withdraw. Lokuta denied the attorney's request, so the attorney asked Conahan's permission. He granted it, she said. Lokuta also testified that she was assigned to handle a divorce involving a longtime court clerk. In court, the clerk said he had noproblem with Lokuta handling the case. When Lokuta ruled against the clerk, he asked Conahan to have Lokuta removed from the case. Conahan granted that one, too, she said. For months, rumors have circulated about an undercover FBI investigation that's said to be under way of some entity in the Luzerne County Courthouse. Some have said that the target is the judiciary. No one has confirmed these rumors. But Louis Sinatra, Lokuta's attorney, previously indicated that may be correct. "There is certainly, in my mind, there appears to be an investigation." Weiss also previously reported that Sinatra and Lokuta will attempt to prove that Lokuta has offered help to investigators in the alleged federal probe. That assistance, they contend, is the reason Lokuta was accused of judicial misconduct in the first place. We hope that there is a federal probe under way and that information about it is released soon. An independent party needs to look into Lokuta's claims. During Thursday's hearing, Judge Lawrence O'Toole of the state Court of Judicial Discipline called Luzerne County's court system the "most dysfunctional court system ever."Every Luzerne County citizen should be embarrassed by O'Toole's statement.
My question is this, why elect judges by popular vote when the President Judge is pulling the strings? And what's with John Hyder, he wants a "do over" when things don't go his way? A federal investigation of the Judges is long overdue. And we think the Times Leader, by printing this article is shining the light on a disgraceful situation.


THE PROTEST


So much is being made about the fact that the county protests today drew a few residents. This small turnout is not indicative of the public anger. People have to work to earn money to pay off their own credit cards. Let's not think the lack of numbers translate into lack of passion on this issue.


McCAIN'S RISE?


So Joe Lieberman former Democratic Vice Presidential candidate is endorsing Republican John McCain for President? Good for McCain, he needs all the help he can get in his bid to pull an upset. Lieberman after all is an Independent Democrat but he doesn't have to be a fanatic about it.


MANANA!!!


Notice that for the last few weeks we were going to get answers about the County financial mess? First there was a snow storm, then there was a postponement, then the audit came. Day after day we were going to get answers. Kind of reminds me of that old Peggy Lee song "Manana Is Good Enough For Me". But is it good enough for the taxpayers? From YOU TUBE, a musical treat:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD8Smtjsxyk

5 Comments:

At 10:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Recently I've been thinking of another Peggy Lee song,
"Is that all there is?"

 
At 11:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

David:

On the "Grier Attack"...did you happen to see the web-poll on the Times Leader site the other day? At one point 96% of those polled thought that Luzerne County...not Tim Grier...was responsible for the county's financial mess. That's a helluva number. And the county's latest strategy...claiming Tim has no standing because he owns no property...sends exactly the wrong message to the citizens of Luzerne County. Many other voters in Luzerne County do not own property. Have they no standing either? Hey...voting...that's overseen by the Board of Elections, isn't it? If we follow their line of thinking, perhaps only those with property should be allowed to vote. Every step these folks make just sinks them deeper in their own quicksand....

 
At 2:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dave: The TL Editorial hits the nail on the head. The County Judges should not interfere with a fellow Judge's calender. Do you think the lawyers asking for the change of Judges didn't pad that into their fees? And do you think the Judges did it out of the kindness of their hearts? The boys in the robes ganged up on the girl in the robe, that's all there is to it. And wouldn't it be ironic if Lokuta outlasts all of them! If an outside legal authority says our county judges are a disgrace, on only the testimony at the Lokuta hearing, imagine if he lived here!

 
At 2:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

John Moses, Alan Kluger, Joseph Quinn. Successful attorneys of stature in private practice.
Joseph Augello, Mike Conahan, and Dave Lupas. The first two were District Justices (can anyone say NightCourt?) and the last guy barely won a case. The common thread is that these three had public funded legal careers all of their lives, paid by us taxpayers vs the three gentlemen who made their way in the public sector. What in the world can we expect when we pick the lowest common denominitor as our elected Judges? It's our fault, we give them the power.

 
At 2:32 PM, Blogger Tom Carten said...

The Yonk says:
There are some people who aspire to public office because they want fame and a bit of notoriety.

Same in the church. Some people get ordained so they can minister to the flock; others get ordained so they can have power and start an upward climb.

On a different topic, The Yonk speaketh:
Another politician who not only steps into the fray but creates some of it himself is Governor Ed Rendell.

Maybe I see Ed for what he is, or maybe I'm just not a politician. BUT: When I was officiating at Sgt. Sherwood Baker's funeral, in comes the Guv, late, and starts working the crowd from the back of the church to the front.

I had the idea he wants to be the bride at every wedding and the corpse at every funeral. No, Governor, this occasion is not about you and it's not another chance to show that you're present; we are memorializing a local young man who died far from home. Deal with it.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home