Tuesday, March 01, 2011

The LuLac Edition #1494, March 1st, 2011


PHOTO INDEX: SURVEY LOGO.

POLL QUESTION

Last week we put up the question regarding how local media were lobbying Judge Edwin Kosik to inflict a stiff penalty on former Judge Mark Ciavarella. Here's what our readers said:

IS IT APPROPRIATE FOR LOCAL MEDIA OUTETS TO GIVE OUT JUDGE EDWIN KOSIK’S E MAIL ADDRESS AND ENCOURAGE READERS, LISTENERS AND VIEWERS TO LOBBY THE JUDGE FOR THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR JUDGE CIAVARELLA?

YES 26%.
NO 74%.

WHAT EFFECT WILL ANY “EDITORILIZING” ON THE PART OF THESE MEDIA OUTLETS HAVE ON JUDGE KOSIK’S DECISION?

a. CREATE THE DESIRED RESULT 4%
b. BACKFIRE WITH THE JUDGE FEELING PRESSURED 21%
c. IGNORED AS SPAM BY THE JUDGE 75%


TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT?

This afternoon I heard Donald Trump on Rush Limbaugh's program. "The Donald" is contemplating a run for President. Not since 1940 (Wendell Wilkie) and 1996 and 2000 (Steve Forbes) has there been an attempt by a businessman to try for the nomination of his party. There is a series of questions regarding Mr. Trump.

NEW POLL QUESTION

DO YOU FEEL THAT STRAIGHT TALKING, BOMBASTIC BUSINESSMAN DONALD TRUMP WOULD BE A GOOD PRESIDENT?

A. YES
B. NO

WOULD YOU CONSIDER VOTING FOR DONALD TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT?

A. YES
B. NO

BACK TO THE WALL, THE FATE OF THE FREE WORLD HANGS IN THE BALANCE, YOU HAVE ONLY ONE CHOICE. PICK ONE

A. TRUMP
B. OBAMA
Click here to take survey

5 Comments:

At 5:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Considering your outrage concerning republicans in the Congresswoman Giffords tragedy, do you think the gun to the head scenario is necessary in your question?

 
At 7:45 PM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
Considering your outrage concerning republicans in the Congresswoman Giffords tragedy, do you think the gun to the head scenario is necessary in your question?
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. THANKS FOR THE POSTING. THE SURVEY AND THE CONTENT IN THIS EDITION HAS BEEN CHANGED. APPRECIATE THE INPUT.

 
At 8:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Responsive and fair as always.

 
At 8:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What was Ross Perot, a statesman?

 
At 8:33 PM, Blogger David Yonki said...

IN RESPONSE
What was Ross Perot, a statesman?
NO, I THINK HE WAS A VINDICTIVE GUY WHO WANTED TO RUIN GEORGE BUSH 41. I THEN THINK HE MORPHED INTO A NUT. MADE BILL CLINTON POSSIBLE. HE MIGHT HAVE RECIEVED 19% OF THE VOTE BUT HE CARRIED NO STATES.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home