Wednesday, May 12, 2021

The LuLac Edition #4,516, May 12th, 2021



Our ”Write On Wednesday” logo

As Liz Cheney fights for democracy, her party is firing her for calling them out on the lie they, as an almost complete body continue to propagate. Thomas Friedman lays it all out for not only the present but the future. Cheney gave a speech on the floor last night and not one of the spineless Trumpanzee robots even had the courtesy to watch her critique of them. The House GOP have no balls and get their itty bitty feelings hurt when someone disagrees with their lord and savior Diaper Don.


I met a girl who sang the blues

And I asked her for some happy news

But she just smiled and turned away

— “American Pie”

I didn’t want to write again about the House Republicans ousting Liz Cheney from their leadership for calling out Donald Trump’s Big Lie. I was going to make this my week for happy news. But to write about anything else on the verge of Trump’s G.O.P. moving to formally freeze out Cheney would be like writing a column about the weather the day after Watergate exploded or about Ford Theater’s architecture after Lincoln was shot. This is a big moment in American history.One of America’s two major parties is about to make embracing a huge lie about the integrity of our elections — the core engine of our democracy — a litmus test for leadership in that party, if not future candidacy at the local, state and national levels.

In effect, the Trump G.O.P. has declared that winning the next elections for the House, Senate and presidency is so crucial — and Trump’s ability to energize its base so irreplaceable — that it justifies both accepting his Big Lie about the 2020 election and leveraging that lie to impose new voter-suppression laws and changes in the rules of who can certify elections in order to lock in minority rule for Republicans if need be.

It is hard to accept that this is happening in today’s America, but it is.

If House Republicans follow through on their plan to replace Cheney, it will not constitute the end of American democracy as we’ve known it, but there is a real possibility we’ll look back on May 12, 2021, as the beginning of the end — unless enough principled Republicans can be persuaded to engineer an immediate, radical course correction in their party.

If someone tried a dishonest power play at the P.T.A. of your child’s school like the one in the House, you’d be on the phone in a flash, organizing the other parents to immediately denounce and stop it. If you read about something like this happening in another pillar of democracy, like Britain or France, you’d be sick to your stomach and feel like the world was a little less safe. If you heard that a banana republic dictator had forced such a Big Lie on his sham parliament, you’d want to picket his embassy in Washington.

Dig deeper into the moment.

Special offer: Subscribe for $1 a week.

But this is us — today, right now. And I fear that we’ve so defined down political deviance in the Trump years that we’ve lost the appropriate, drop-everything, Defcon 1, man-the-battle-stations sense of alarm that should greet the G.O.P. crossing such a redline.

“It just bothers me that you have to swear fealty to the ‘Dear Leader’ or you get kicked out of the party,” Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a moderate Republican, said Sunday on “Meet the Press.” “It just doesn’t make any sense.”

But it doesn’t end there. We’re witnessing a daylight mugging of our democracy — and I am not talking only about the voter-suppression measures being passed by Republican-controlled legislatures in swing states.

There are also the new laws to enable Republican legislatures to legally manipulate the administration and counting of the votes in their states. Election expert Rick Hasen explained it all in an essay in this newspaper last month: “At stake is something I never expected to worry about in the United States: the integrity of the vote count. The danger of manipulated election results looms.”

We’re talking about new regulations like the Georgia law that removed the secretary of state from decision-making power on the State Election Board, clearly aimed to curb the powers of the current secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, after he rejected Trump’s request that he “find” 11,780 votes to undo Joe Biden’s victory in Georgia. We’re talking about Arizona’s Republican-led State Senate hiring a company owned by an advocate of the “Stop the Steal” movement to examine the November ballots from Maricopa County. And much more.

According to a new report by Protect Democracy, Law Forward and the States United Democracy Center, “Across the country, state legislators are proposing bills that would give partisan state legislators greater control over elections while hamstringing experienced state and local election administrators who have traditionally run our voting systems. …

“Many of the bills would make elections more difficult to administer or even unworkable; make it more difficult to finalize election results; allow for election interference and manipulation by hyperpartisan actors; and, in the worst cases, allow state legislatures to overturn the will of the voters and precipitate a democracy crisis.”

Had these bills been in place in 2020, it added, “they would have … raised the prospect that the outcome of the election would have been contrary to the popular vote.”

As Stanford University democracy expert Larry Diamond summed it all up to me, while we’re focusing on Liz Cheney and the 2020 elections, Trump’s minions at the state level “are focused on giving themselves the power to legally get away with in 2024 what the courts would not let them get away with in 2020.”

You tell me how American democracy will ever be the same again and how these people can be trusted to cede power the next time they win the White House.

And while you’re at it, tell me how America can ever again be a credible observer and upholder of democratic elections around the world — so vital to our national security and the hopes and dreams of democrats in all these countries who look to America as a beacon of democracy and the rule of law. The next time we want to question election results in Russia or Iran or Poland or Hungary, what do you suppose their elected autocrats will say?

They’ll say: “Listen to you? Your Republican Party turned a blind eye to a guy who told the biggest election lie in the history of the Milky Way Galaxy. And it wasn’t even in the service of some urgent, compelling policy. It was just so he could stay in power, salve his ego and deny he lost.”

So, thank you, Liz Cheney, for doing something vitally important and clarifying — something that only a conservative Republican like you could do: force the G.O.P. at every level to choose whether to stand with Trump and his Big Lie or with the Constitution and the most important conservative principle of all — reverence for the rule of law.

Because, if Trump and friends are not stopped, one day they will get where they are going: They will lock in minority rule in America. And when that happens, both Democrats and principled Republicans will take to the streets, and you can call it whatever you like, but it is going to feel like a new civil war.

I don’t use that term lightly or accidentally. We are all the product of our life experiences, and my first reporting experience was living inside the Lebanese civil war in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

I saw close up what happens when democratically elected politicians think that they can endlessly abuse their institutions, cross redlines, weaken their judiciary and buy reporters and television stations — so that there is no truth, only versions, of every story. And they think that they can do it endlessly — cheat just one more time, break one more rule, buy one more vote — and the system will hold until they can take it over and own it for their own purposes.

Then one day — and you never see it coming — the whole system breaks down. Whatever frayed bonds of truth and trust that were holding it together completely unravel.

And then it’s gone. And there is no getting it back.

Thomas L. Friedman is the foreign affairs Op-Ed columnist. He joined the paper in 1981, and has won three Pulitzer Prizes. He is the author of seven books, including “From Beirut to Jerusalem,” which won the National Book Award.

Monday, May 10, 2021

The LuLac Edition #4,515, May 10th, 2021


Thursday, May 06, 2021

The LuLac Edition #4,514, May 6th, 2021

 LULAC @ 15!!! 

Today we start our 15th year together. We appreciate the support and  patronage. Through that time we  have had over 1,5 million hits. Thanks for your support. On to sweet number 16! 




EDITORS NOTE: LULAC will feature articles on the candidates running for Luzerne County Judge. Prior to this edition we commented on Jim Bobeck’s , Tarah Toohil's, Alexandra Kokura Kravitz' and Laura Dennis' campaign. This is the last in the profiles. We'll put up all the links in future editions of LuLac.  

10 years ago Stefanie Salavantis turned the political world of Luzerne County upside down. The incumbent Democratic District Attorney had just sailed through her primary without an opponent filing on the Republican side.  The summer of that year was devoid of much political drama until the Luzerne County Republican party endorsed a young Attorney  named Salavantis.  Right after Labor Day, a spirited campaign ensued. With a big Democratic advantage in registration as well as an incumbent in office, the chances looked slim that this new entrant would win. But with the sting of the “Cash For Kids” scandal still resonating with many voters, as well as an impressive war chest,  an incredible advertising campaign by Bob Harper Productions of Florida Salavantis won an upset victory by about 220 votes.

Here is a sample one of those ads.

After that questions began to emerge as to ho a person a few years out of  Law School could handle a job like big. It turns out she could and she did. Salavantis was re-elected in 2015 as well as 2017. Her secret as a successful DA was not dramatic but knowing who to place in key positions on her team. Salavantis has had a good record of getting convictions, One of them close to my heart was the tracking down of the killers of a former co worker of mine Michael Onley. Mike was murdered in a drive by shooting one evening in October od 2013. He was walking someone he knew to their car. 

An advocate against violence since he lost his brother to it, DJ Mo became a victim of the violence he rallied against. After leaving the Outsiders bar on South Main Street in Wilkes-Barre early Sunday morning, he was shot in the head and killed, the victim of an apparent drive-by. The killing happened sometime after the bar closed. Witnesses said there were a number of people outside the bar when someone drove by and fired. One friend believes the victim was escorting a female friend to her car at the time. The Wilkes University alum kept his show going on the campus radio station, WCLH 90.7 FM long after he left school. The program was known as a place for up and coming musicians to make their mark.

After an intense investigation, his killers were found and convicted.  Roberto Battle and David Nealy were sentenced on Thursday after both were found guilty in December of first-degree murder. Prosecutors say Battle and Nealy killed Michael Onley, known as DJ Mo, outside a bar in Wilkes-Barre in 2013. They both are now in prison. FOR LIFE.

This case is just one of the cases the Salavantis prosecutors investigated, tried and own. Recently Salavantis  talked to Sam Lesante about her years as a District Attorney.

Salavantis has name recognition, is accessible and has a record most DA's  in the state would envy. That should give her an advantage on Election Day.

Here is Salavantis with some supporters. Mike DeCosmo, Christopher Slusser and Gene Rafalli for putting the event together as well as the Hazleton Swing Club. (Photo: Salavantis Facebook page)

Salavantis took seriously her role to nit only work with police to but protect them. When two State Troopers were attacked in the mi teens, she and her family held a fundraiser at The Majestic in Pittston. Suffice to say by these photos, it wasn't catered. Here is Stefanie bagging the dogs and her late father Harry working the grill.  
(Photos: LuLac archives)


(Photo: AP)

If ever there was an example of a political crucifixion it would have to be what’s happening to Liz Cheney. Cheney is in deep trouble with the seditionists of the GOP because she is telling the truth. That’s it. She is not bowing to the ridiculous lies embraced by  Donald Trump and his followers.  “The Republican Party is at a turning point, and Republicans must decide whether we are going to choose truth and fidelity to the Constitution,” Cheney wrote in a Washington Post op-ed in which she doubled down on her determination to confront former President Donald Trump’s continued lies about the 2020 election.

Trump’s campaign of falsehoods led to the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol, which itself was an attempt to stop the certification of the presidential election. And yet the former president has continued, with increasing frequency of late, to repeat the baseless lie that the election was somehow stolen.

“Trump repeats these words now with full knowledge that exactly this type of language provoked violence on Jan. 6. And, as the Justice Department and multiple federal judges have suggested, there is good reason to believe that Trump’s language can provoke violence again,” Cheney wrote.


Well he not only was thrown out of office, lost both Houses and wasshutdown on Twitter, but Donald Trump was FIRED from Facebook. He and his supporters will whine and cry but the bottom line here is this was justified. Trump’s hate speech and just plain un-democratic actions (not to mention the 18,000 lies) pegs him as an “unreliable” source of any kind. I’m not sure we can even trust him to post photos of cats on the damn site without him making some type of inflammatory remark. 

So nearly four months to the day following the January 6 riots at the US Capitol — which was the catalyst for Facebook kicking him off its platform — the social network’s Supreme Court-like oversight body has voted to permanently ban President Trump from the service.

The decision was announced Wednesday morning and was all but guaranteed to be seen as unsatisfactory and widely derided, no matter the outcome. A decision that went against the president was always going to enrage conservatives who think Big Tech is aligned against them. In fact, President Trump on Tuesday launched a blog-like platform of his own, one that will allow his supporters a convenient place to see every update he posts. Meantime, letting him return to the world’s biggest social network was also always going to raise the ire of the other half of the country, who will point to disinformation and untruths disseminated by the president — and even Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s own words, when he posted this to his followers the day after the Capitol riots: “We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great. Therefore, we are extending the block we have placed on his Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until the peaceful transition of power is complete.”  (LuLac, MSN)



Congressman Matt Cartwright (Photo: LuLac archives)

U.S. Representative Matt Cartwright (D-PA-08) applauded the vision for our nation that President Biden laid out during his address to a Joint Session of Congress:

“Democrats in Congress have worked with this administration to deliver on the key promise we made to the American people 100 days ago – that we would do more to beat this pandemic and ensure everyone’s economic well-being. And since we passed the American Rescue Plan, we are seeing real progress on getting shots in arms, money in pockets, kids back in school and people back in jobs. Now that help is here, we are on a path to recovery, but our work in Congress is only just beginning.

“President Biden this evening presented a vision for our nation where we don’t just return to pre-pandemic normal, but usher in a new era where the United States truly is the land of opportunity for all. Millions of American working families have struggled for years with economic, child care and education challenges, and the pandemic has only made them worse. We now have an opportunity to create good paying jobs, support families and give children a strong foundation for success in life in every part of the country. Together, the American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan frameworks will guide us as we continue our mission to Build Back Better as one nation.”


Senator Bob Casey (LuLac archives)

in remarks at the Economic Policy Institute, U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D-PA), a member of the Senate Intelligence and Finance Committees, outlines a new policy on China that begins with investments in U.S. workers and children. The full text is below:


Presented at the Economic Policy Institute

The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) has been at the center of the fight for justice and fairness for over three decades. EPI has always put the needs of workers first and has questioned corporate policies that undermine workers. As we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic and an ongoing economic crisis, I believe the United States is at an inflection point in history.

At home, we are working to address the racial justice crisis, which has gone on for far too long. Globally, we are in a new era of great power competition between our Nation and the Chinese Communist Party. In order for our workers to win this competition, we must to take an all-inclusive approach to our domestic and foreign policy to make fair competition the driving principle.  We must ensure our workers have the tools necessary to win this competition. But we must also be clear eyed about the challenge. We are in competition with a communist government.

The reason our workers and our firms face challenges is not because we were out-hustled or out-innovated by China, as some contend, but because firms in China have explicit state backing. The Chinese government restricts access to their market and steals our technology for the benefit of their industries. The Chinese government, the Chinese Communist Party, plays by different rules. Some argue that China builds things faster and better than we can. Not true. The structures they build are not built to last.

As we approach a future of competition with the Chinese Communist Party, we hold no animus towards the people of China or Chinese Americans who enrich and helped build our country.

For the last few decades too many working Americans have not been able to get ahead, and believe that their children’s lives will be worse. Multinational corporations and the super-rich have benefited from a rigged tax code while the workers who produce that corporate wealth, suffer. The American promise of opportunity for all has increasingly been only opportunity for the wealthy and well-connected.

President Biden is taking critical steps through the American Rescue Plan, the American Jobs Plan and the American Families Plan to enhance our competitiveness and support workers, small businesses, and families across the country. We have a long way to go, but the investments from these bills are critical to ensure that all Americans can benefit as we recover from the pandemic, that all families can be finically secure, and that unions, which built our middle class, are front and center in the American recovery.

In order to lead the world in a more democratic direction, we must insist that the power of people to shape their future at the ballot box also includes economic power. Democracies cannot endure without policies that empower workers and invest in children. To achieve economic growth that makes fairness and social justice a reality, the worker must be at the center of our agenda for change. The worker drives the growth and, therefore, our Nation has a stake in that worker’s health, skills and economic security.

As business has achieved a larger but less fair share of the pie, both at home and abroad, American standing, stability and security have been compromised. We know our workers and businesses can outcompete anyone in the world if the playing field is level. The United States thrives on competition. However, non-market economies, like China, are working to recreate the global economic system in a manner that advantages their communist, mercantilist system, at the expense of American workers.

The United States needs a sustained and coordinated strategy to address the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party. And the United States should work with our allies to execute it. This is not a problem unique to the United States, there is no need to treat it as such.

If core democratic principles of fair competition are going to survive, we must (1) consider and evaluate the necessary changes to our trade policies to institute a system that supports our National objectives; (2) build alliances to support fair competition across Nations and (3) deploy a comprehensive and coordinated strategy to address the ways countries and companies exploit the global economic system to take advantage of workers.

The Chinese government views as concessions what we consider necessary conditions to participate in the global economic system.

If we are going to confront China and prevent the export of its economic model, the United States must support (1) fair terms of trade; (2) fair competition and economic conditions; (3) fair labor standards and workers’ rights; (4) protection of our national security interests and critical capabilities and (5) policies that invest in our Nation’s children and communities.


The current structure of the international trade system must change if it is going to support competition, resiliency, workers and our security interests.

Let’s take the Trans-Pacific Partnership as an example. There are many in the foreign policy community who continue to believe leaving the TPP was a huge mistake. They're wrong, but not because the stated objectives of the agreement were wrong. Rather, the rules of the agreement did not support the stated objectives. TPP, as written, would have allowed, on average, over 50% of originating content to come from China, thereby further enmeshing U.S. supply chains with the authoritarian Chinese government.

Fair competition is a core American economic value. As our new USTR Katherine Tai has said “meeting this moment will require us all to have an open mind and embrace the tremendous possibilities that can come from thinking outside the box. It means looking at old problems in new ways.”

This will require developing and deploying a comprehensive and coordinated strategy to address the ways countries and companies take advantage of the global economic system — from exploitation of workers and polluting the global commons, to cyber-based espionage, forced technology transfer and theft of intellectual property.

To address these challenges we must update and enhance rules of origin;  work with allies to align action on trade safeguards and address the emerging threat of extraterritorial censorship by the Chinese government.

Rules of Origin for Non-Market Economies: With respect to the structure of our trade agreements, half of content can originate from China and still enter into the U.S. through an FTA. That's not right.

In the context of the TPP, rather than aligning an economic bloc to counter China, it would have further intertwined U.S. supply chains with those of the Chinese government. Any future trade agreement must include a supplemental rule of origin for non-market economies. This means countries, like China, cannot free ride on trade agreements anymore. The Market Economy Sourcing Act - S. 4008 does just that. The U.S. also should consider adopting similar measures, with respect to Buy America and Buy American policies.

Coordination and Reciprocity with Allies on Trade Safeguards: Under our current trade safeguard measures, the United States has the ability to protect the domestic market from dumped and subsidized goods, but we don’t have the necessary tools to protect our exporters when they compete against dumped goods in foreign markets.

The impact of subsidies don’t stop at the water’s edge. We should consider working with allies to create a common defense against illegal subsidies from non-market economies, like China. This could mean establishing reciprocal remedies against trade distortions (such as illegal subsidies). Measures could be limited in scope, such as AD/CVDs on goods from non-market economies. We must work with our allies to better protect manufacturer’s ability to retain market access abroad in the face of illegal subsidies. The United States must also continue to work with allies to address the pernicious threat of overcapacity.

Address Extraterritorial Censorship by China: We have seen the Chinese government act in an increasingly assertive manner with respect to extraterritorial censorship.

Senator Cornyn and I held a hearing on censorship as a nontariff barrier to trade last year and the issue has only gotten worse since then. At our request, the International Trade Commission is undertaking a study on extraterritorial censorship, but we must also consider providing USTR with enhanced tools to address these issues. Measures could include disclosure of censorship requests by non-market economies backed by strong responses on the part of the Federal government.

This is a concern for our firms as well as our allies. In March, the EU, UK and Canada joined the United States in imposing sanctions on Chinese officials related to Xinjiang abuses. Meanwhile, China is using its market access as a weapon against Australia, a key ally and Five Eyes partner. To that end, I fully support the Administration’s clear and repeated articulation of their support for Australia.

The Chinese Community Party dictates virtually everything that enters its market. These actions are part of a broader effort by the Chinese government to reform the global economic and social environment in a manner more consistent with its authoritarian system.


The current global trading system allows countries like China to cheat, largely with impunity.

Pennsylvania knows all too well what may be in store for states and communities across the country if we don't address the systemic threat that the Chinese government’s economic agenda presents. Over the past several decades the Chinese Communist Party has expanded subsidies for steel, aluminum, transportation and other critical infrastructure, thereby cornering the market through state-directed investments. And now we are seeing the same playbook for emerging technologies like AI, semiconductors, biotech and robotics.

Pennsylvania suffered record manufacturing job losses over the last generation. According to EPI, China cost the United States 3.7 million U.S. jobs between 2001 and 2018. 2.8 million jobs —three-fourths of the total jobs lost in this time period—were in manufacturing. 137,300 of those jobs were in Pennsylvania.

Jobs numbers alone provide little insight into the family and community trauma that ravaged many small towns.

That is why we must continue to support our domestic steel and aluminum industry and work with our allies to prevent the Chinese government from stealing our future – either by stealing our intellectual property, or by manipulating its currency or by pushing our manufacturers out of business by dumping cheap products in our country.

The threats to a fair global economic system exist everywhere. They come from abroad and right here at home. The 2017 Republican tax bill creates an incentive to offshore jobs and manufacturing. The Chinese Communist Party entices firms with subsidies and the promise of cheap labor only to steal industrial secrets and drive competitors out of business with cheap goods. Fair competition starts at home by ensuring firms making-it in America aren’t disadvantaged against large multinational corporations that ship jobs and production offshore. And countries that cheat on trade, like China, must be held to account.

We must:

Retain the current 232 and 301 tariffs while undertaking a full scale evaluation of our international trade and economic policies and posture.

Strengthen Buy America procurement requirements and establish supplemental rules of origin for non-market economies. If we don’t make something in the United States, we should be buying it from our allies who share our high standards.

 Update procurement contracts and reporting requirements related to disclosure of the country of origin for products used to fulfill these contracts.

Include Labor Standards in a “Buy Clean” Framework: We must ensure strong labor standards are included in any “Buy Clean” framework. The objective of reducing domestic and global climate pollution and improving sustainability across supply chains is hollow if workers are exploited in the process.

While discussions on a buy clean framework continues, we should consider establishing a tiered national-level reporting structure for labor rights and conditions. Countries with high labor standards, Tier 1 countries, like the U.S. the UK and EU, would be presumed in compliance. Production and supply chains coming from countries on lower tiers could have enhanced monitoring, inspections and reporting. Inputs and products from Tier 4 counties, those engaging in gross labor violations or human rights abuses, would be barred from eligibility in a “Buy Clean” framework.


The Chinese Communist Party’s regional and global objectives create direct and indirect economic and security challenges. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) estimates that roughly one-third of global shipping goes through the South China Sea.[10] Over half of global trade ships through Asia.[11] Efforts by the Chinese Government to control port infrastructure and shipbuilding in the region and globally, through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) should be an alarm bell for all of us. BRI is not simply about ports or railroads, or creating projects to absorb their overcapacity, it is about influence.

At the same time, the COVID pandemic and increasing tension in the Indo-Pacific region is exposing cracks in the Chinese model of doing business. Countries are recognizing the drawbacks of the Chinese government’s BRI. Initially enticed by major investments in infrastructure, developing countries are recognizing the unsustainable debt burden brought on by BRI and are now looking to the IMF and other international institutions for relief.

China’s human rights record is also under increased scrutiny. When forced labor is the floor, no worker can compete. And the Chinese government has made no secret of its actions on that front. The genocide in Xinjiang is shedding new light on forced labor as a major part of its agenda that flouts human rights. Everywhere you turn, the Chinese government is weaponizing its institutions to suppress dissent and democracy in order to better control resources, control water and control factors of production. This includes the Chinese government’s continued repression and torture of the Tibetan people, as well as its efforts to tamp down democratic aspirations in Hong Kong.

Across sectors – defense, trade, development – the Chinese government’s malign agenda is being exposed and coming under increasing scrutiny. The Chinese Communist Party’s lack of values-driven governance is a vulnerability.

China’s broader military ambitions are also necessary considerations in the trade and economic sphere because the Chinese government’s growth agenda blurs the lines between its economic and defense sectors via its “civil-military fusion” approach. The Chinese government’s investment in, and theft of, technology and innovation supports the expansion of its security posture through development of surveillance technology, nuclear powered submarines and products across the commercial spectrum. This means the Chinese government doesn’t view competition strictly through the lens of dollars and cents. When Chinese firms and state sponsored enterprises compete against America’s, it is done so with broader objectives in mind, including those of their military.

Manufacturing is core to our future economic competitiveness. In the United States, manufacturing represents about 11 percent of GDP, but is responsible for 70 percent of R&D, according to analysis from McKinsey.  Manufacturing drives innovation. When you lose manufacturing you lose innovation. Countries that don’t make things don’t endure.

We have seen all too clearly the cost of relying on China, a non-market economy, for our Nation’s critical capabilities. Worse still, we have very little visibility on what other vulnerabilities may exist with respect to production dependencies in other sectors.

We must:

Engage in a comprehensive and ongoing review of critical supply chains and capacities to gain visibility on vulnerable supply chains.

Establish an outbound investment review mechanism to ensure we are not losing critical capacities to foreign adversaries.

The administration is currently embarking on a comprehensive supply chain review for critical capacities. This is action I proposed in the America LEADS ACT, last year’s Democratic proposal on competitiveness. The Senate is now undertaking a bipartisan effort across several committees of jurisdiction – including the Foreign Relations, Commerce and Finance Committees – to tackle the competitiveness challenge head on. In the coming weeks, we hope this effort will culminate in a comprehensive, bipartisan Senate-wide China competitiveness package that will task the U.S. government with meeting the China challenge. Ensuring our critical supply chains are secure and taking remedial action against vulnerabilities is an essential element of this effort.


All workers should have the right to equal protection under the law, to join a union and freedom of association, and to earn a wage that allows them to provide for themselves and their families. No worker should fear violence and harassment. Our trade policies must support and uphold these rights for workers everywhere. In many countries, laws restrict women’s rights to own property, to inheritance, to divorce, to child custody, to open a bank account, and equal access to an education.

The Chinese government thrives on the repression and exploitation of people—both its own citizens and those around the world. Equal protection under law, regardless of gender, is a fundamental human right. The advancement of women’s rights and economic empowerment is not simply a matter of human rights. It is a matter of economics, and global security.

Dr. Valerie Hudson, a professor at Texas A&M, just released a book titled The First Political Order which analyzes comprehensive empirical data on the status of women around the world. Dr. Hudson documents how discrimination against women has significant consequences for a society, with worse outcomes for: conflict, stability, economic performance, governance, and food security.

To advance the rights of women globally we must:

Modernize the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Modernizing and strengthening standards within GSP, should include adding standards on human rights, women’s rights and economic empowerment, non-discrimination and violence and harassment in the workplace. Legislation I authored, the Women’s Economic Empowerment in Trade Act or S. 4008, would do just that.

Incorporate the Rights of Women as Core US Trade Policy Objective:  USTR Tai has committed to making the advancement of the rights of women a core U.S. trade policy objective at USTR during her confirmation hearing. I look forward to working with USTR on that effort.

We must also engage in a way that invests in the American workforce and industry and reestablishes standards for pay, conditions of work and benefits that reflects our values as a Nation and places the conditions for fair competition and workers at the helm of the global economy.


We cannot simply look outwardly to address the challenges posed by China. We must also have the economic and structural conditions at home to win the future. And that requires significant investment and a long term commitment in our workers, in infrastructure, in our communities and in our most precious resource, our children. One in seven of our children are growing up in poverty.[18] That’s almost 11 million kids. A Nation cannot continue to prosper if one out of seven of its young brains are not provided the opportunity to develop and succeed. While aptitude is distributed universally, opportunity is not.

If some of our best and brightest, some of our creative thinkers aren't able to achieve their full potential because they grow up in poverty, we all pay. We all pay when our Nation's children don't reach their full potential.

The worker drives growth and it all starts with children, before they are born. We must build an American compact before and after birth. The first is a guarantee of a healthy birth and the second is a guarantee of a healthy start.

A healthy birth for every child requires:

Access to family planning for women so they can time their  pregnancies;

Comprehensive prenatal care; and

Universal health coverage to address poor health outcomes including, maternal mortality rates.

In 2020, I proposed what I called the “Five Freedoms for America’s Children” – the freedom to be healthy; the freedom to be economically secure; the freedom to learn; the freedom from hunger and the freedom to be safe from harm. These are the fundamental conditions necessary for a healthy start for every child. By investing these resources in our children, we will lay a foundation for economic growth that rivals the world. At the same time, our Nation must focus on the urgent work of helping the workers of today and the communities where they live.

When a community experiences a large job loss or is undergoing industry transition, it can have devastating impacts on the entire region. We must enact automatic economic and fiscal stabilizers to support regions through these challenging times. By establishing assistance that turns on at the outset of an economic shock, we can avoid much of the economic pain communities often experience. Supporting the tax base, local businesses, schools, workers, and preventing the hollowing out of towns we’ve seen all too often.

In supporting communities and workers it is also essential that we protect workers’ ability to collectively bargain and reverse the steady erosion of individuals’ rights in the workplace. Researchers, like MIT Professor Zeynep Ton, are showing us that there are other ways forward. Investing in employees pays off. This research affirms what we have known for a century: when companies invest in their workers and when workers are empowered to bargain for salary and compensation, everyone is better off, and EPI has led the way on that research.

We must fight back against the relentless attacks on unions in this country and halt the proliferation of practices like forced arbitration and non-compete agreements that strip workers of their ability to challenge discrimination and unfair labor practices. We must ensure we “build back better”; that no workers are left behind as technological changes and automation may upend large sectors of our economy, and make sure that workers aren’t cast out as “digital day laborers”, without rights or recourse. We must support working parents through access to quality affordable childcare and by making the improvements to the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit permanent.

The International Labour Organization began with a recognition that “universal and lasting peace can be accomplished only if it is based on social justice” and that humane conditions of labor were essential to bringing about justice.

The worker must be at the center of our agenda for change. To advance fairness and justice, freedom, security and human dignity.

America is strong when our workers are strong and economically secure. America is strong when our communities are strong. American is strong when we can provide for the least among us and when parents don’t worry about lead poisoning the water their children drink.

America is strong when our alliances are strong and based on shared democratic values. America is strong when our domestic and foreign policy vision is grounded in democratic values, supporting workers, the middle class and those striving to lift themselves into the middle class.

This is a great task, one that is worthy of a great Nation.





Tune in Sunday morning at 6 on 94.3 The Talker; 6:30 on The Mothership 1340/1400 am, 100.7 and 106.7 fm; and at 7:30 on The River 105 and 103.5.





Our 1987 logo

USSR performs nuclear test at Eastern Kazakh/Semipalitinsk….in Northern California  there’s a heatwave with May 7t checking in at 105°F in Sacramento, CA……On May 7th, Diane Chambers' (Shelley Long) final episode on TV comedy "Cheers" airs….Here's a clip when Long came back as a guest a few years later..  

 Gary Hart quits US democratic presidential race due to affair with Donna Rice….In Ireland, The Loughgall ambush: The SAS kill 8 IRA members and 1 civilian, in Loughgall…..sthe first heart-lung transplant take place in Baltimore…….Ajax of the Netherlands win 27th European Cup Winner's Cup against Lokomotive Leipzig 1-0 of East Germany in Athens……..NHL Clarence Campbell Conference Final: Edmonton Oilers beat Detroit Red Wings, 4 games to 1……"Little Shop of Horrors" is released in Germany….a Colt revolver (Peacemaker) of 1873 sells for $242,000……NHL Prince of Wales Conference Final: Philadelphia Flyers beat Montreal Canadians, 4 games to 2…Last episode of "The Late Show with Joan Rivers" airs after the host is fired by the Fox network and the number one somg in LuLac land and America was “Always” by Atlantic Starr.

Wednesday, May 05, 2021

The LuLac Edition #4,513, May 5th, 2021



Our “Write On Wednesday” logo.

This week we loom to the Times Shamrock board that looks into public corruption in the state and what it means for its residents.


Some level of incompetence is as inevitable in government as in any other large enterprise. But Pennsylvania’s government is unique in continually forcing residents to root for incompetence — a lesser evil than corruption.

Over the last decade, Pennsylvanians have seen a steady parade of high-level public officials perp-walk into prison — an attorney general, county judges, senior leaders of both parties in the state House and county commissioners — and the forced resignations of others, including two Supreme Court justices.

Such hubris is as appalling as it is expensive. This time it’s the Pennsylvania School Employees Retirement System, the larger of the two gigantic state pension funds that, together, are underfunded by more than $60 billion.

Because of that, each of Pennsylvania’s 500 school districts annually must give PSERS an amount equal to 34% of its payroll, an amount that would put any private-sector enterprise out of business. That is in addition to the state government’s contributions to PSERS and the plan covering state government employees, which together total nearly $5 billion a year.

For that kind of money, taxpayers deserve honesty and transparency, at the very least.

Instead, PSERS has been caught by the news media fudging its earnings claims and passing on $25 million in additional costs to taxpayers rather than school employees. It’s not clear whether that was inadvertent. As reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer, federal authorities are examining how PSERS leaders reacted when internal estimates revealed that earnings would not meet their projections.

Now, the agency has been served with federal grand jury subpoenas regarding its $3 million acquisition of land in Harrisburg for construction of a new headquarters. It has hired a law firm, the contract with which identifies the parcels in question.

And, in classic Pennsylvania fashion, the law firm will be paid up to $367,500 in public money as the feds examine whether the agency’s conduct was incompetent or criminal.

Neither is acceptable. Regardless of the inquiry’s outcome, it’s obvious that PSERS requires reform and change at the top.