The LuLac Edition #665, Dec. 12th, 2008
PHOTO INDEX: WALTER GRIFFITH, WILKES BARRE TAXPAYER ADVOCATE, WYOU TV'S INTERACTIVE NEWS HOST ERIC SHEINER, PRESIDENT HARRY S. TRUMAN, WILKES BARRE COUNCIL PRESIDENT KATHY KANE, OUR 1968 LOGO AND CONGRESSMAN PAUL KANJORSKI.
WAR ON BLOODSUCKERS
Congressman Paul Kanjorski is doing his part to make sure the bloodsucking credit card companies don't get the chance to gouge the public in these tough economic times. The Congressman who is the Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises, sent letters to the CEOs of Capital One, Citigroup, Bank of America, and J.P. Morgan Chase expressing serious concern about reports of recent interest rate increases, especially for individuals who pay their credit card bills on time. Chairman Kanjorski urged the companies to allow customers to access credit at reasonable rates, especially considering that the banks received taxpayer assistance to keep credit available through the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Additionally, Chairman Kanjorski strongly supported and voted for H.R.5244, the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights, which passed in the House on September 23 and is waiting on Senate action. The bill provides crucial protections against unfair, but unfortunately common, credit card industry practices. Among other things, it ends unfair, arbitrary interest rate increases, by requiring ample notice before rate hikes and permitting lenders to raise rates on existing balances only if minimum payments are more than 30 days late (except for increases caused by changes in stated variable and introductory offers). The text of Congressman Kanjorski's letter to Capital One, Citigroup, Bank of America, and J.P. Morgan Chase follows: The purpose of this letter is to express my serious concerns about recent reports of increases in interest rates on credit cards,especially for those individuals who have played by the rules and paid their credit card bills on time. I appreciate your attention to this matter. In recent days, I have received many calls and emails from my constituents expressing their concerns about increases in their credit card interest rates. Specifically, these individuals have indicated that they have received letters from their credit card issuers notifying them of changes in the terms of their credit card agreement. In some cases, these letters indicate that interest rates on credit card balances will increase by more than 6 percent, even though the card holders have paidt heir bills on time. For many, these increases could not come at a worse moment. Earlier this month, noted economists announced what many already knew -- that our country is in a recession and has been for the last year. At a time when many Americans are facing increased financial difficulties as a result of this recession, credit cards can provide them with a safety net in the event of an emergency, such as a medical incident, a car accident,or home repairs. Moreover, many of my constituents have specifically raised serious concerns that financial institutions receiving billions of dollars in taxpayer money through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) are now raising interest rates on average Americans, the very same Americans who pay federal taxes to support the activities of the TARP. I share their well-founded concerns. In my view, individuals who have maintained good credit and who have worked to make their payments on time should not have to face increases in their interest rate in order to increase the income of a financial institution receiving direct support from the federal government.
BANK BAILOUT BUST
The bank bailout is turning out to be a bust. The greedy financial inatitutions which should be lending money to small busineses are not. They are either acquiring new assets or keeping the money in a vault.Even with his faults, you have to credit that Illinois Governor for putting the feet of Bank of America to the fire in the recent factory controversey. There has to be a board of oversight that makes sure credit is given to responmsible parties. If it is not, we should take the money back. Period.
AUTO BAILOUT
For a while there I was against the Auto Bailout. But the more I think about it, maybe we should think of this as a government sponsoed job program. Here's what I would do:
A HOT TIME!!
Wilkes Barre City Council had a very interesting meeting this past Thursday night with the approval of a budget no one was happy with. Mayor Tom Leighton said he wasn’t happy with it as a taxpayer and not proud of as the mayor. The budget calls for a 23-mill property tax increase and hikes other fees. Council Chairwoman Kathy Kane, Vice Chairman Tony Thomas Jr., Bill Barrett and Rick Cronauer voted for the budget. Councilman Mike Merritt voted against the budget and against increasing the earned income tax to 3 percent. The tax hike represents a 31-percent increase and translates to an average annual increase of $70 for a taxpayer. A mill is a $1 tax for every $1,000 of assessed property value. Freshman Council Mike Merritt was criticized for pulling a political stunt by voting against the budget. This must have been a shock to the rubber stamp council that is used to voting like bobbing head dolls for every measure the administration wants. Merritt was criticized for being an independent voice and representing his constituents. The City Council members should take a slow walk through City Hall after traveling to their meeting on a per diem and look at those 11 by 14 photos on the wall of past Mayors. In the 60s, Wilkes Barre Council meetings were a hotbed of activity and debate. Con Salwoski, John V. Morris and Frank Slattery got their share of heat from Council members and taxpayers. Activists like Joe Noterman and Ambrose Meetsky got to say their piece and it was more than 5 minutes. And unlike Walter Griffith, Sam Troy and Bob Kadluboski weren't ridiculed for their comments. Kadluboski by the way was thrown out of the Council meeting by Chair Person Kathy Kane for making a comment she didn't like. Kadluboski came back to the meeting and only got a "time out" from the former school teacher turned politico. Kane's reaction to Kadluboski has been getting more reaction on the street than the Bobster's behavior. Unlesss it was a derogatory remark toward her personally, the man has a right to express his opinion. Wilkes Barre Council people get paid a salary and benefits. They work for the people but more importantly in their oath uphold the concepts of the Constitution which includes freedom of speech. This attitude toward the people by the Council as a body has to change. Given the attitude fellow Democrat Mike Merritt got for daring to vote no, there is little hope Council will change their ways. The only way to do that is through the ballot box and so far Wilkes Barre voters have been like sheep voting for Democrat after Democrat. It won't change unless it happens at the ballot box.
1968
Vice President Hubert Humphrey certifies the 1968 election. Richard Nixon is elected President by the Electoral College with 302 votes, Humphrey had 191 and George Wallace had 45……David Eisenhower marries Julie Nixon, the daughter of U.S. President-elect Richard Nixon………in Pennsylvania the salary of a State Senator was $7200.00 with expenses $4000.00....…Former St. Louis Cardinal and resident of Pittston Charlie Trippi was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio....and in Luzerne County Judge Bernard Brominski announces changes in the lower judiciary establishing district justices to replace the more than 132 Justices of the Peace in the County….and 40 years ago this week the number 1 song in Lulacland and America was a combined effort by the Motown greats the Supremes and Temptations with “I’m Gonna Make You Love Me”.
5 Comments:
Walter recently told me he is running for Luz Co Controller. A 14th question... What do you think of his chances?
All guys like Griffith want to do is help the city. You are correct, if the Council included instead of belittled (but then again what chance does Walter have when they diss Merritt!!!) things in WB would be much better.
Got the link to Walter's appearance on WYOU?
IN ESPONSE
Got the link to Walter's appearance on WYOU?
I'M NOT SURE THEY LINK UP THE 11PM CAST ON THEIR WEBSITE. BUT HERE'S THE LINK:
http://pahomepage.com/content/about/wyou_interactive
IN RESPONSE
Walter recently told me he is running for Luz Co Controller. A 14th question... What do you think of his chances?
I THINK HE HAS A WAY BETTER CHANCE COUNTY WIDE THAN IN WILKES BARRE. WILKES BARRE POLITICS IS LIKE A CLOSED DEOCRATIC SHOP. MY FRIEND PETE GAGLIARDI SAID IT BEST AFTER THE LAST ELECTION, "THE PARTY (THE DEMS) IN WILKES BARRE VOTE OVERWHELMINGLY FOR CANDIDATES THAT WILL PROTECT OR PRESERVE THEIR POLITICAL INTERESTS. THEY GET A BLOCK OF VOTES AND BUILD ON THAT". GRIFFITH FACED THE CLOSED CLUB IN BOTH COUNCIL RACES. IN 2003 HE CAME UP SHORT BY A FEW VOTES CITY WIDE BUT IN 2007 WAS DEFEAED BY A LARGER MARGIN BECAUSE HE WAS IN A CONCENTRATED DISTRICT. IF HE WERE TO RUN COUNTY WIDE, HE'D GET THE SUPPORT (SUCH AS IT IS OF THE COUNTY GOP) AS A BASE. WITH THE MESS IN THE COUNTY, HE CAN CAMPAIGN AS A REFORMER. IT MIGHT BE HARD FOR THE DEMS TO DEFEND THEIR POSITION, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU HAVE DIVISION IN THE RANKS IN THE COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE. HE CAN RUN SAYING PETRILLA WAS ASLEEP AT THE SWITCH, HE CAN RUN SAYING THE INTERIM CONTROLLER IS A LAME DUCK AND HE CAN RUN AS A WATCHDOG IN THE MANNER THAT STEVE FLOOD DID. HE'LL HAVE A BIGGER POOL OF VOTES, WON'T GET HAMMERED IN THE CITY BY THE DEMS, AND CAN RUN UNBEHOLDEN TO ANYONE EXCEPT THE TAXPAYER. THE DEMS WON'T HELP HIM IN WILKES BARRE, THE GOP WILL PROVIDE A BASE (IF THEY DON'T REVERT TO FORM AND TRY TO SCREW THEIR OWN CANDIDATES LIKE THEY LOVE TO DO!) BUT HE WILL BE A FRESH FACE WITH A REPUTATION FOR DEFENDING THE AVERAGE GUY AND KEEPING HIS PUBLIC PROFILE HIGH.
Post a Comment
<< Home